A Schoolteacher Is Crushing Scandal-Plagued Texas AG. And More Great News That’s Bad For Trump.

Twelve courts just shut down the regime’s data grab—and Trump’s own judge saved a gun ban

After all of Trump’s chaos this weekend, you could’ve closed the app and let it wash over you—the way the people insisting nothing can be done are counting on. You didn’t. You showed up to find out what’s actually true. That’s not nothing. That’s defiance.

So take a breath, because here’s the truth: the momentum is on our side—and I can prove it. Four times the regime swung, and four times it missed. You’re about to see exactly how.

First, one thing that hits harder than it looks: hit the ❤️ like button and restack this. The regime is working overtime to make sure stories like these never reach you—and a single tap blows right past that. It’s how we beat an algorithm built to bury good news. You’re not just clicking a button. You’re making sure the truth wins the fight for someone else’s feed.

And if you’ve been putting off becoming a paid subscriber—today’s the day to fix that. What you’re reading has no advertiser behind it, no corporate owner, no billionaire. It exists because readers decided it should, and it only keeps going if enough of them step up. Be one who does:

A TEACHER IS OUTRAISING PAXTON THREE TO ONE

James Talarico used to teach middle school in Texas. Now he’s the Democrat taking on Ken Paxton for US Senate—and this spring he raised $30 million in just three months, more than triple what his opponent pulled in. A schoolteacher is burying a sitting attorney general in small-dollar donations.

And it really was small-dollar: 97% of his donations were $100 or less, and the most common job among his donors was teacher. Then he carried that message into the belly of the beast: 4,000 people packed a hall in Collin County, Paxton’s own home turf, just to hear him.

Paxton was indicted for felony securities fraud and impeached for corruption by the GOP-run Texas House. At that rally, Talarico pointed down the road: “Ken Paxton’s mugshot was taken just a few miles from here... If Ken Paxton will sell out his own friends for a quick buck, what makes you think he won’t sell you out in the United States Senate?” Texans seem to agree—a recent poll found barely 4 in 10 think Paxton has good character. Still seems high for him.

No Democrat has won a Senate seat in Texas since 1988, and Republicans were counting on it staying that way. But when a schoolteacher fights a scandal-plagued AG to a dead heat on his own home turf, the whole map cracks open.

TWELVE COURTS. ZERO WINS FOR THE REGIME.

For a year, the regime has been trying to grab the private data of every voter in America—Social Security numbers, birth dates, home addresses, driver’s license numbers—by suing states that refused to hand them over. Friday night, a federal judge in New York became the twelfth in a row to throw the case out.

Judge Mae D’Agostino rejected every argument the regime made. And here’s the ugliest part: the law it leaned on was the Civil Rights Act of 1960—written to stop Southern officials from destroying Black citizens’ voter records. The regime tried to twist a law built to protect Black voters into a tool to seize their data. D’Agostino wouldn’t allow it.

Twelve straight losses in the district courts—and the one time they appealed, they lost that too. A study released this week found the rolls were accurate all along. This was never about clean elections. It was about the regime getting its hands on your data—and judge after judge keeps slamming the door in its face.

TRUMP’S OWN JUDGE JUST BEAT THE GUN LOBBY

The gun lobby went to court to kill the ban on assault weapons in Illinois. They lost—and the judge who beat them was put on the bench by Trump himself.

Illinois passed that ban after the 2022 Highland Park parade massacre, and the gun lobby has been trying to gut it ever since. Judge Amy St. Eve shut them down. The gun lobby has a favorite legal argument they use to wipe out gun laws—and she used that exact argument to keep this one alive.

They picked this fight. One of Trump’s own judges just ended it.

HE TANKED A HOUSING WIN TO RIG VOTING

At midnight on Saturday, the biggest housing bill in thirty years became law—built to put up more homes, drive down costs, and rein in Wall Street. It cleared the House 358 to 32 and the Senate 85 to 5. In this Congress, that kind of agreement almost never happens.

And Trump refused to sign it. Not because he opposed it—but because he was holding it hostage. He wanted the Senate to first pass his SAVE America Act, a bill that would make it harder for millions of Americans to vote. The Senate wouldn’t. So Trump called the biggest housing win in a generation “a yawn” and let it become law without him, robbing his own party of a victory lap less than four months before the midterms.

Elizabeth Warren asked plainly: “Why did President Trump sit on the landmark housing bill for more than 2 weeks? Maybe because there was nothing in it for him personally—no gold-encrusted ballroom, no Qatari jet, no $2 billion crypto deal.”

The regime needs you to believe that the fix is in, that nobody’s fighting, that you might as well sit down. But here’s the truth they don’t want you to know: you are not powerless, and you are not alone.

That teacher out-raising a corrupt attorney general three to one? That’s not luck—that’s what winning looks like. So here’s the deal we’ve made: we answer to you and nobody else. No advertiser, no owner, no billionaire in a back room. Just readers who decided the truth was worth funding and the fight worth joining.

Reading this is how it starts. Funding it is how it grows. Become a paid subscriber today and take your place in the fight:

Then hit the ❤️ like button and restack this. Not for me—for someone out there who thinks they’re fighting alone. Share how a schoolteacher is crushing Ken Paxton, and you hand a stranger proof we can win. That’s not just a share—it’s a lifeline.

Onward!

Scott

---

The regime’s data grab was never about fraud—the voter rolls were already accurate. So what do you think they actually wanted all that private data for?

Trump let the biggest housing bill in 30 years pass without his signature—because he cared more about making it harder to vote. What does that tell you about who this regime actually works for?